The Washington Post reported that Musk is threatening to personally take over the company after buying a large stake.
Users on the social media platform are having a field day with the news.
Reactions were extremely mixed, with some arguing that Musk would bring some much needed levity and a renewed focus on transparency, while the other side pointed out that having so much wealth and influence concentrated in one man couldn't possibly bring more.
For the record, that's Musk's own pitch for the acquisition.
I invested in the company as I believe it has the potential to be a platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
Many people on the social networking site called his bluff.
Max Boot, a columnist for the Washington Post, said he was frightened by the impact on society and politics if Musk acquires the social media site. We need more moderation for democracy to survive.
One example of why pooling wealth in the hands of a few is a societal disease is the example of Elon Musk.
Many pointed out the double standards at play.
Robert Reich wrote that Musk blocked him when he criticized Musk for worker violations. Does that sound like a free speech advocate to you?
Musk supporters argued that the buy could be amazing for Doge coin, and that it would be fun.
A lot of users were excited to be a part of the ride.
If Musk takes over, I will move to Canada.
If we tell Musk that buying the social network will end homelessness, he won't do it.
Getting a read on Musk's true intentions is not a good idea. One thing is for certain, and that is that it is in for a very rocky ride.
There are more on the saga.
Are you interested in supporting clean energy adoption? At UnderstandSolar.com, you can find out how much money you could save if you switched to solar power. Futurism.com may receive a small commission if you sign up through this link.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
