Several countries in Europe have reported a hybrid of the Omicron and Delta coronaviruses. Here is what we know about the hybrid, which has been dubbed Deltacron or Deltamicron.

Scott Nguyen, a scientist with the Washington, D.C., Public Health Laboratory, noticed something odd while inspecting the international database of coronaviruses genomes.

He found samples in France that had been identified as a mix of Delta and Omicron. People can be exposed to two coronaviruses at the same time. The conclusion was found to be wrong when Dr. Nguyen looked at the data.

The sample looked to have a combination of genes from the two different strains. Scientists call them viruses. When he looked for the same pattern of changes, he found more possible replacements.

In an online forum called cov-lineages, scientists help one another track new variant. Double-checking possible new variants is essential, as was the case with the Delta-Omicron recombinant found in Cyprus.

There is a lot of proof that is needed to show that it is real.

It was found out that Dr. Nguyen had been correct.

"We rushed to double-check what he suspected, and we quickly confirmed it," said Etienne Simon-Loriere.

More samples of the virus have been found by Dr. Simon-Loriere and his colleagues. They obtained a frozen sample from which they were able to grow new recombinants in the laboratory. The first genome of the recombinant was posted on March 8.

There were 33 samples of the new variant reported in France, eight in Denmark, one in Germany and one in the Netherlands in a March 10 update.

Two cases in the United States have been found by the genetics company. The doctor said that he and his colleagues were looking for more cases in the United States.

The idea of a hybrid between Delta and Omicron might be worrying. There are many reasons not to panic.

This is not a novel concern according to Dr. Simon-Loriere.

The recombinant is very rare. It has existed since January, but has not yet shown the ability to grow.

According to Dr. Simon-Loriere, the genome of the recombinant variant suggested that it wouldn't represent a new phase of the epidemic. The spike gene is almost entirely from Omicron. Delta is the rest of the genome.

When it comes to invading cells, the spike protein is the most important part of the virus. It is the main target of the immune system. People who have acquired defenses against Omicron through infections, vaccines or both should work just as well against the new recombinant.

The surface of the viruses is very similar to Omicron, so the body will recognize it.

Scientists think that Omicron's spike is responsible for its lower odds of causing disease. The variant uses it to invade cells in the nose and upper airway, but not in the lungs. The same penchant may be displayed by the new recombinant.

Dr. Simon-Loriere is conducting experiments to see how the new recombinant performs in cells. Experiments on hamsters and mice will provide more information. The experiments won't yield insights for a while.

It's so fresh that we don't have any results.

People can be exposed to two versions of the coronaviruses at the same time. If you go to a crowded bar with a lot of people who are sick, you might breathe in Viruses from more than one of them.

It is possible for two viruses to invade the same cell at the same time. The new genetic material may be mixed up with the old material to create a new hybrid virus.

It's not uncommon for coronaviruses to recombine. Most of these genetic shuffles are evolutionary dead ends. The ancestors of the viruses did not fare as well.

The new hybrid is being referred to as the AY.4/BA.1 recombinant. In the weeks to come, that will probably change.

A group of scientists came up with a system for naming new coronaviruses. They give a two-letter abbreviation to the viruses, starting with the letter X.

It is likely that the new recombinant will be named XD.

On March 8, a second team of French researchers posted a study online with their own analysis of the same recombinant. The virus was isolated like Dr. Simon-Loriere and his colleagues. The title of their study is Deltamicron, which has not been published yet in a scientific journal.

The team did not credit Dr. Simon-Loriere's team for their original work. He criticized the scientists for giving lurid nicknames for the recombinant that were immediately picked up in news articles and social media posts, which claimed that it was a hoax or had been produced in a lab.

These unconventional names are stirring a nest of conspiracy theories.

It is not known how well the name sticks.