My friend messaged me, along with a link to the Balldo, saying that he was glad he got to see things like this. It took me a while to comprehend what I was seeing. It is a sex toy, and that is all that is clear. It was described on the company's website as a ball dildo that allows you topenetrate your partner with your balls.
I needed to know more.
For anyone who doesn't want to go down the same rabbit hole, which includes a number of porn videos featuring both cartoon and real phalluses.
Balldo's marketing materials remind the viewer that the human scrotum has a lot of nerve endings. According to Balldo's marketing, nerve endings have gone underutilized in sex. Two excited cartoon scientists and one more excited cartoon naked man could be done to solve this egregious oversight.
Balldo claims in its video that a bullet-shaped sex toy can transform testicles into a phallus. A person can slide their balls into this harness, as well as a pair of accompanying spacers, in order to form an object rigid enough to be inserted into an orifice. The Balldo is intended to leave the scrotum exposed so the wearer can still feel stimulation.
It will take years for the possibilities of Ballsex and the associated Ballgasm to be truly understood, according to Balldo.
After trying out the Balldo, I think this sentence is the point. It is the point I am choosing to take from the experience.
There is a brief but necessary history of Dadaism.
If you've ever had a conversation about what art is called Fountain, it's almost certain to come up. One of the most influential pieces of the early 20th century was a urinal that was turned on its side and signed with a nom de plume. It was supposed to be displayed at an exhibition of the Society of Independent Artists, an organization that was so open-minded that it would not reject any artwork from its members.
The Society voted not to display Fountain, starting a debate over what constitutes art and where the lines of decency lie. Depending on who you are talking to, the debate continues. Fountain asked us to question why we see art the way we do, and it held up a mirror to our artistic sensibilities.
The dadaist movement rejected logic and rationality and instead leaned more into nonsense and chaos, with a strong anti-bourgeoisie theme. Rather than adhering to the artistic standards that a small group of wealthy people decided on, dadaist works aimed to force the art world to consider what role art has to play in the world.
This is relevant to my experience testing the Balldo, a sex toy that uses testicles and scrotum for sex, but more on that later.
But how?
The Balldo can be used and shown to other people, but there are other ways to use it. The latter was more fulfilling. Paying forward the gift my friend gave to me, I showed the videos and website of the torpedo-shaped ball cup to a few others. The reactions were the same.
What?
How would that work?
What?
Who asked for this?
What?
Every single person I showed this to had a specific question. At one point in the video, the cartoon scientists ask aloud, "But how can we use the balls to have sex?" In response, every person independently had more or less the same reaction.
Do these people think penetration is the only way to have sex?
It is a valid point. Sex toys designed for penises and testicles have always run into problems. Is a toy really going to provide a better experience than a hand, mouth, or any other orifice can provide, if it can provide some new form of stimulation or sensation? Is it going to improve the time you spend with your partner, or is it going to be an awkward mess that is not worth the time or energy to convince someone to try with you?
All Rights Reserved © 2024
