It has been a trying few days for Mick Mulvaney, the former South Carolina congressman who nows serves as acting White House chief of staff. Last Thursday, he managed to torpedo weeks of the Trump administration's messaging on the Ukraine scandal with just a few sentences, telling flabbergasted reporters that the president indeed withheld military aid from Ukraine until it agreed to investigate a cockamamie conspiracy theory about a secret server full of Hillary Clinton emails. "We do that all the time with foreign policy," Mulvaney said, seemingly admitting the precise abuse of power that prompted House Democrats to open an impeachment inquiry of his boss.
Later that day, he issued a mop-up statement that treated his earlier comments like they had never taken place. "The president never told me to withhold any money until the Ukrainians did anything related to the server," Mulvaney said. He also accused the media of "miscontru[ing]" his comments to "advance a biased and political witch hunt," even though his verbatim comments arguably required no construing to establish the existence of a corrupt quid pro quo that the White House, to that point, had strenuously denied.
As if exacerbating one ongoing crisis within the GOP was not enough, during the same press conference, Mulvaney defended the administration's announcement that it would host next year's G-7 summit at Doral-a struggling Florida golf resort that just happens to be owned by the Trump Organization. "Doral was by far and away, by far and away the best physical location," Mulvaney said. Even after Trump reversed course on the heels of a bipartisan backlash to this flagrant bit of self-enrichment, his chief of staff still wasn't ready to concede the argument. "At the end of the day, he still considers himself to be in the hospitality business," Mulvaney said on Sunday, describing the President of the United States. "He wanted to put on the absolute best show-the best visit that he possibly could."
This sequence of events did not sit well with Republican senators, many of whom elected to offer frank, on-the-record evaluations of Mulvaney's performance in interviews with Politico. Iowa senator Chuck Grassley described him as "probably somebody that didn't know what they were talking about," while Missouri senator Josh Hawley called the Ukraine fracas "certainly a distraction" and not "helpful." Perhaps the most ominous-sounding assessment, though, came from South Dakota senator John Thune. "It's hard to figure out what led him to make some of those statements last week," he said, describing it as a "tough week" and a "rough patch" for Mulvaney. Thune added: "Ultimately, he serves at the pleasure of the president."
Politico notes that no senators are openly calling for Mulvaney's replacement, perhaps in part because it hard to imagine who would want the job of chief of staff to a president who is the subject of an active impeachment inquiry. According to Bloomberg, Trump has privately floated the possibility of replacing Mulvaney with a number of figures who are already prominent with the MAGAsphere, including Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, and deputy chief of staff Chris Liddell.
The fact that Mick Mulvaney ever became the right-hand man to a president is still kind of incredible to those who have followed his brief career in national politics. A former South Carolina state legislator who was elected to Congress as a Tea Party Republican in 2010, Mulvaney did not have a particularly productive track record as a lawmaker in Washington. He joined the Freedom Caucus, sung the praises of fiscal conservatism, and used his speaking opportunities on Capitol Hill to rail against the dangers of government overreach. As a member of the House Financial Services Committee with oversight of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Mulvaney referred to the CFPB as a "joke" and expressed his belief that it should not exist.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
