Judge scraps Trump lawsuit to shield tax returns from Congress

The House Ways and Means Committee has been looking for Trump's tax returns since the middle of 2019. The IRS program that audits presidential tax returns annually was a topic of discussion after Trump left office. Trump claimed that Neal's stated purpose was a ruse for seeking to exact political punishment.

Neal was discouraged from making Trump's tax information public. The judge said it was not his job to stop the lawmaker from taking that step.

The judge wrote that publishing confidential tax information of a political rival is a move that will plague the inventor. It is the Chairman who has the right to publish the returns. Congress has granted him extraordinary power, and courts don't like to second guess congressional motives. The court must dismiss this case because it will not do so here.

The records will not be turned over to the House in the next 14 days. The judge urged both sides to reach an agreement to govern the records during an appeal, but said that if they cannot agree, Trump's lawyers can ask the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals for relief.

The former president was concerned that the tax returns would be used to hurt Trump politically. He pointed to a string of comments by Democrats, including Neal and Pelosi, to suggest that the motives for obtaining the returns seemed mixed.

These statements are irrelevant to the Supreme Court's analysis of whether Congress has a valid legislative purpose.

The House Ways and Means Committee chair has the power to demand tax returns from the IRS under a federal law, which has diminished the significance of the House's drive to obtain Trump's tax records.

Trump was fighting to keep his tax returns and other records from the Manhattan district attorney's office, which sought them through a grand jury subpoena in connection with an investigation into various fraud allegations involving the Trump Organization.

The records were turned over to the Manhattan prosecutor in February of this year after a lengthy court battle. Unlike Neal, the prosecutors are not allowed to release those records publicly because they were part of a grand jury probe.

Neal changed the scope of the inquiry when he requested the returns this year. The request for tax returns for tax years 2013 to 2018 was the most recent one, but the request for returns from 2015 to the present is more extensive.

The court agreed with the Federal Parties that the Committee could study the program further if they returned from the other years. A presidential audit can go beyond a current return to related returns from other years.