RALEIGH (N.C.) On Friday, North Carolina judges rejected the state's latest photo voter identification law. They agreed with minority voters that Republicans had pushed through rules tainted in racial bias to stay in power.
Two of the three judges on trial declared that the December 2018 law was unconstitutional, despite the fact that it was intended to implement a mandate for photo voter identification in North Carolina. This mandate was added to the Constitution by a referendum two weeks prior. They claimed that the law discriminates against Black voters and violates their equal protections.
Superior Court Judges Michael OFoghludha, Vince Rozier and Vince Rozier stated in their 100-page majority opinion that the law was at least partially motivated by an unconstitutional intention to target African American voters.
Other laws requiring voter identification that are less restrictive would have been sufficient to meet the legitimate non-racial purposes for implementing the constitutional amendment mandating voter ID, deterring fraudulent voting, and enhancing voter confidence.
After a three-week trial, the majority decision is likely to be sent to a state appels court. This court had previously blocked laws enforcement last year, while the case was being heard. This ruling does not make the law applicable.
It is unlikely that voter ID mandates for absentee and in-person balloting will be implemented in 2022, with a similar federal lawsuit set to go to trial in January.
The ruling reflects "how the states Republican-controlled legislature undeniably implemented this legislation to maintain its power by targeting voters of color, said Allison Riggs, the plaintiffs lead attorney.
Representatives for Republican legislative leaders, House Speaker Tim Moore, and Senate leader Phil Berger didn't respond immediately to emails requesting comment.
For a decade, GOP legislators have been trying to make it mandatory that voters carry photo IDs.
Republicans believe voter ID laws are necessary to increase public confidence in elections as well as to prevent voter fraud. This is a common belief across the country. Many Democrats view the mandates as an attempt to suppress voter choice.
Continue the story
A federal appeals court ruled that several sections of a North Carolina election law from 2013 were invalidated. It included a mandate for voter ID. The ruling stated that GOP lawmakers had written the mandate with near surgical precision in order to discourage Black voters from voting, which tends to favor Democrats.
Lawyers representing the voters sued the 2018 law, claiming it had the same racial flaws as the 2013 law. This was due to a long-term effort by North Carolina elected officials in order to weaken African American voter participation to maintain control over the General Assembly. The 2013 law was briefly implemented in the 2016 primary elections.
GOP legislators and their lawyers disagreed. They claimed that the new ID rules were approved with significant Democratic support. The ID rules are designed to preserve ballot access and ensure legal citizens can vote.
Comparable to 2013, the categories of qualifying IDs have been greatly expanded to include government-employee and college students. You can also get free IDs from your county elections board or early-voting sites. People without IDs may still vote by filling out a form at your local voting precinct.
Judge Nathaniel Poovey, in a dissident opinion, stated that the passage of the voter identification law is compatible with the state constitution. He cited its support by several Black legislators as well as the citizens who voted for it.
Poovey stated that the evidence of competence before this panel of three judges does not indicate that our legislature intended to racially discriminate.
However, the majority of the panel ruled that the changes did not eliminate racial bias completely and would permanently block enforcement of the ID law.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, there are about three dozen states that require voters to present some form of identification to vote. About half of these states only accept photo ID.
One provision in the sweeping federal overhaul for elections, pushed this year primarily by congressional Democrats, would effectively nullify state voter ID laws. It would allow people without ID to sign a form instead at the polls.
Five Black voters and one biracial were sued in Wake County Court on the same day as Democratic Governor was overthrown by GOP lawmakers. Roy Cooper's veto of 2018 voter ID bill.
During the trial, some plaintiffs testified that they had difficulty obtaining IDs or voting under the old photo ID law.
The GOP lawyers claimed that all voters will continue to be eligible to vote under the 2018 law.
Plaintiffs cited an analysis by a University of Michigan professor that showed Black voters are 39% more likely not to have a qualifying photo identification than registered white voters. However, the analysis did not include data about certain categories of qualifying IDs.
Federal preapproval was required for changes to these or other North Carolina voting procedures. A 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision meant that such preclearance actions no longer were required. Just a few weeks later, the legislature approved the voter ID law 2013.
