Liverpool 2-2 Wolves: Julen Lopetegui says it is 'impossible' winner was ruled out

It is impossible for a winning goal to be ruled out in an FA Cup match.

The assistant referee had a flag up for a possible goal against the centre-back, who had taken the original corner and picked up the ball on the left.

Wolves had to settle for a 2-2 draw because there was no evidence to overturn the decision.

After the game, Lopetegui went into Andrew Madley's room and said that he didn't like the way the game was being played and that his players deserved to go to the next round.

He was angry that the goal was allowed to stand even though the Egypt forward appeared to be in an ineligible position.

What actually happened?

After Wolves' goal was ruled out, Nunes took a corner that was headed by Nathan Collins, and then passed it back to him on the left wing.

He dribbled to the byline, and his cross was mishandled by Toti, who turned the ball into his own net to give Wolves the lead.

Toti took his shirt off, but the assistant had his flag up.

The VAR couldn't see the camera angle to overturn the decision.

"We have seen it, the offside does not exist, I'm sorry," he said. It isn't possible.

We've seen the images and they don't exist.

The decision isn't right. Sometimes I make mistakes and other times I don't. It's a pity that we have the help of VAR, because it's not an obvious goal.

I don't know about their third goal. I can understand why they are angry with the picture where it appears to be in the wrong place. The VAR needs to have more than one angle.

The FA Cup is run by the Football Association, which does not follow the guidance of Uefa and Fifa, which caused confusion in the crowd and among pundits.

Emile Heskey said that they were in the studio trying to figure out.

State-of-the-art stadiums should be shown on the screen. It needs to be there.

"Nueves was in an incorrect position, but that wasn't immediately clear." We have a decision, but it needs to be more clear.

The goal had been allowed to stand.

Toti headed the ball in an attempt to stop Gapko's attempt to clip over the Wolves defence.

That meant that he was onside, and he was able to score.

In all the leagues, it is the same. We have to talk to the refs about this situation.

The player who took advantage of his position was the one who was in the middle of the field. The only reason that Toti is going for it is because of the player who is on the field.

It is very frustrating, according to a former player. Football fans know that the goal should not stand. It has to be dealt with by Toti because he has to believe that the player is not on the field. In our opinion, the law is not right.

He said that he thought that Toti's goal should have been ruled out. That is what I think.

That is a good thing for me, that is not usual in Spain. I love talking to him, but I have to tell him that the offside isn't there. It is clearly stated.

What do the rules say?

The incidents are related to when a new phase of play begins.

According to Law 11 in the FA's rules, a player who receives the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball is not considered to have gained an advantage.

A'save' is when a player stops, or attempts to stop, a ball which is going into or very close to the goal with any part of the body except the hands/ arms.

There was no clear evidence to overturn the decision of the assistant referee, who thought that Nunes was in an area that was not his.

The goal was not ruled out as a result of Toti's headed ball.

Why was there VAR?

Fans and spectators will be asking why there was VAR at this game, but not in the earlier game where there was a disagreement over two of the goals.

The use of the VAR was only at the premier league grounds.

'Rule should be scrapped' - views from #bbcfootball

We have to put up with VAR ruining celebration of goals but it doesn't get the calls right when it reviews them. This farce would be better if there was an odd human error.

There was a new era in which Toti's goal was not. After looking at the screen, what is the essence of VAR?

I don't understand the offside law if Totti's goal wasn't in fact an illegal one. I am a fan of the Reds.

Richard doesn't understand football if that's correct. They didn't touch the ball, but they were ahead of the game. The two scored on the second phase. There is one given. A person is not allowed.

There were two crazy things from the game. I've said it before, but the rule that allowed the goal was terrible and should be abolished. There isn't a camera for the Wolves to be in the correct position. There isn't something right there.