This is more of the same for Trump. He is only ever speaking to his base, because the base gives him validation, and he thinks he will get re-elected via the racist playbook he used in 2016, demonizing immigrants and trumpeting policies that hurt people of color. He puts amateurs in charge of things that require expertise because he disdains expertise generally (it makes him feel dumb) and is narcissistic enough to believe that he can personally achieve anything without it.
Most importantly, he is too selfish and cloistered from the real world to have any meaningful sense, or feeling, of responsibility for the public good, because he cannot view anything that's happening through the lens of anything except his personal interests. This means that he cannot respond in the public interest to anything so big or high-stakes as a pandemic. In his mind, there is no public interest that exists outside of his own personal needs and wants.
As a result, the White House response on Wednesday addressed none of the public's primary concerns or needs, most of which center on the lack of testing for COVID-19 and the commensurate lack of information about how widespread the virus is. The speech was self-congratulatory and included several statements about the travel ban that had to be walked back by the administration the very next morning, causing chaos in international airports and further damage to markets, in the worst plunge for the DOW since 1987's "black Monday" and the fourth worst day in the 124-year history of the index.
It's easy to imagine an alternate universe where the president is reasonably competent and has a sense of public service, because for the most part, we've been historically spoiled with presidents who display some degree of both (or at the very least, a response as competent as that of our global democratic peers.) In that alternate reality, the president would have addressed an anxious nation with answers to their most pressing questions, and a plan to keep Americans safe and healthy inasmuch as we are able. This would, by necessity, begin with and revolve around widespread testing. The president would have surrounded himself with experts, listened to them, and deployed the full resources of the agencies designed to deal with emergencies on this scale, none of which would be hamstrung by partisan budget cuts and understaffing. He would not have relied on the mediocre intellect and amateur opinions of his unqualified son-in-law and in-house xenophobic scaremonger to produce a set of recommendations.
And perhaps most unlike Trump, the hypothetical president would have modeled a sense of civic duty, instead of one pathetic line demanding bipartisan unity after nearly three years of stoking partisan divisions from the comfort of the Oval Office. He would have inspired people to look out for their neighbors by practicing social distancing in order to protect the vulnerable, and conveyed the importance of being responsible for fellow Americans because we really are all in this together.
But he doesn't fundamentally believe that, and in the past 24 hours, we've seen plenty of evidence that Trump isn't even doing things conducive to flattening the curve -or slowing the spread of the virus in order to avoid overwhelming our health-care system-himself. He's still planning to hold rallies and has been seen at recent events with people who have been diagnosed with COVID-19. Yet the White House is saying he doesn't need to be tested, and is basically ignoring most of the precautions Americans are being asked to take, often at great sacrifice, for the good of the whole. The whole is an abstraction to him, and a meaningless one. He cannot take it seriously because he's too solipsistic to conceive of a crisis of public health as anything but a variable that might affect the stock market and, by extension, his approval ratings.
His demeanor on Wednesday was subdued-not the bombastic off-the-cuff Trump we usually get in public addresses. The self-aggrandizement was even turned down a notch, if only because the speech was scripted. He looked genuinely frightened. But make no mistake: He's not frightened for America. He's frightened for himself. His own fate is the only thing he's capable of taking seriously.
Elizabeth Spiers is the founder of The Insurrection, a digital strategy, messaging, and polling firm that works with progressive Democrats, and the former editor-in-chief of the New York Observer.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
