Jump to: Brentford, Man United, Bournemouth, West ham, Villa, and Wolves.
There's a chance of a burn foul on Gabriel.
In the 59th minute, a free kick from the right flank was punched by Nick Pope. The game continued despite Gabriel going down under Dan Burn's challenge.
There was no penalty.
The law asks if contact with an opponent's body or equipment impedes the opponent's movement. Burn almost pulled Gabriel's shirt round, so there's a clear argument for a penalty, but was the VAR right not to get involved?
The pulling of the shirt can turn into a foul. Do referees look for too much contact when making a call? For the group stage of the World Cup, there was some success but still questions over consistency.
Shirt pulling is rarely looked at by the VAR, but holding with both arms around the attacker is more serious. Seven of the 15 penalties awarded this season have been for handball, seven for a foul when playing for the ball and only one for any kind of holding offence.
The new refs chief wants the decisions to stay on the pitch, but also wants video referees to be able to intervene if they feel a foul has been committed. When watching the replays, the VAR takes into account the referee's description of what he saw. The VAR needs to ask if the referee's assessment of the holding is fair or not.
It's difficult to judge whether or not an attacking player has been impeded, which is why most of the time these calls stay on the pitch. There was no VAR intervention last week when Adam Smith tugs on the shirt of Christian Pulisic before he shoots.
Lee Mason is the only VAR to give a penalty for holding, but the five-man panel says he missed a penalty for shirt pulling. Mason did not advise a review six weeks before the Nunes-Yates incident.
It may not be enough for the panel to say that Attwell should have given a penalty against Burn.
There is a chance of a penalty for Murphy's handball.
The ball hit Jacob Murphy and Granit Xhaka tried to cut a cross into the box from close to the by-line, but the ball hit him and the players demanded a penalty.
There was no penalty.
It was an easy decision for the VAR to make, as it was not a penalty.
Murphy's left arm was struck by the ball.
It may have been a different outcome if it had hit the player's arm, which was raised and could be seen as creating a barrier away from the body. The proximity between Xhaka and Murphy would have been a factor.
The ball hit the arm of France defender Dayot Upamecano against Poland at the World Cup. The ball hit Upamecano's arm rather than his body.
On Konate's own goal, there is a possibility of a hand ball.
In the 19th minute, Ibrahima Konate diverted a corner kick into his own net, giving the Bees a lead they wouldn't relinquish. There was a VAR check for a possible case of mistaken identity.
The goal stands.
Konate's own goal wasn't ruled out because it was an own goal, but because of accidental attacking handball. The ball would have been ruled out if it went straight into the goal. The same thing happened when Tim Ream scored for Crystal Palace on Boxing Day.
It would have to be deliberate or unnatural for his arm to be away from him.
It took the VAR more than 112 minutes to confirm the goal, which seemed to be an own goal by Konate.
Wissa's goal was ruled ineligible.
In the 26th minute, Yoane Wissa scored from close after a corner routine, but the assistant's flag was raised for an obstruction against the forward.
The VAR decided that there was no goal.
A great spot by the assistant from a scramble inside the box, which involved several plays of the ball.
Wissa scored after Alisson made a save and Wissa was stood off the field.
Wissa is on the goal line even though he is not on the field. There needs to be two players between Wissa and the goal for him to be onside.
There is a chance that the shot from Wissa is possible to be an incorrect one.
Wissa's shot went into the far corner after he chested the ball down at the back post. There was a review of the flag by the assistant.
The goal was ruled not to be a goal.
The review took 90 seconds but the lines needed to be drawn.
It was a simple decision to deny the goal as the ball touched Mee on its way into the back of the net. Any touch of the ball by a player who is not on the field is a gross offense.
It wouldn't make a difference if the ball flick off Konate just before it hit Mee, as the defender's actions wouldn't be a deliberate play to reset offside.
There is a chance that the goal is possible to be possible.
There was a review for an incorrect decision when Darwin Nunez scored after running onto Thiago's ball over the top.
The goal was ruled not to be a goal.
There is a clear gap between the lines for the VAR review to see, which is one of the more obvious VAR reviews of its type. From the camera angle, the lean of the players can be deceiving.
Mbeumo may have committed a foul before he scored.
Bryan Mbeumo scored the third goal of the game in the 84th minute when he muscled Konate off the ball and calmly finished. Did Mbeumo foul the defender to get possession?
The goal stands.
The VAR is unlikely to get involved with the high bar for intervention if the referee deems the contact not to be a foul.
There wouldn't be enough in it for the VAR because Mbeumo challenged the defender shoulder to shoulder. If the forward challenged with his shoulder into the back of Konate, that would be a foul.
In October, Erling Haaland scored for Manchester City against the Seagulls. The player used his strength to win the ball and the VAR didn't intervene.
There's a possibility of a red card on Van de Beek.
Bournemouth were on the attack on the edge of the box when Marcos Senesi tried to play the ball out of bounds. As he was about to kick it, he slipped into a man who was injured.
There wasn't a red card.
The VAR must ask himself if Senesi put the safety of an opponent at risk when he made the challenge. There is no chance of a red card for the Bournemouth player who slipped in the process of passing the ball.
He was injured as a result of the collision.
If the player had raised his foot high to catch the opponent instead of the players coming together as a result of the slip, there would be a red card. Their legs came together when Senesi slipped into Van de Beek.
There's a chance of a penalty, for example, a handball byStacey.
The ball hit Jack's hand when he tried to challenge Alejandro Garnacho for a looping ball inside the area.
There was no penalty.
The VAR should always take into account the expected arm position for a player's movement, according to the law. It was not expected that he would get his arm out of the way of the ball.
There was no penalty that was correct.
Struijk may have committed a foul on Bowen.
In the 44th minute, West ham was on the attack when Jarrod Bowen went to ground. The play continued and the referee called for a goal kick.
The penalty was scored by Lucas Paqueta.
If Coote had played advantage, the foul would have been identified in the game and the play would have continued.
The review for a penalty is possible because Coote didn't judge Struijk on the merits of the foul.
There's no doubt that the VAR made a good decision in the case of the first goal.
There is a chance of a penalty due to the fact that the ball was hit by Bueno.
In the 75th minute, Ludwig Augustinsson crossed from the left wing and when Wolves defender Hugo Bueno tried to clear the ball it bounced up on his arm.
There was no penalty.
The VAR made an easy decision. If a defender tries to play the ball and it goes up onto their arm, they shouldn't be punished for it.
The logic is that if a defender has their arm away from the body, it cannot be used to their advantage.
There is a chance of a penalty, for example, a handball by Dunk.
When the game was goalless in the fifth minute, Tom Davies tried to head the ball across the box, but it hit the arm of Lewis Dunk.
There was no penalty.
At the start of the season, we saw an incorrect VAR penalty when the ball hit Lucas Digne's arm, even though he had his back turned.
This is the same situation. Dunk is in a justified position having jumped, not above shoulder height and at short distance. The decision was made by Michael Oliver.
The information was provided by the league.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
