If he showed any evidence of caring at all, you could almost commend him for caring enough to make a movie about the last days of silent film. It pretends to be a movie about loving movies, but more than anything else, it seeks to reflect glory on its creator. It only comes off as cheap and tinny because it advertises its extravagant and glamour. The central character is a narcissist with no complexity and no interior contradictions. The writer-director thinks he has created a vision of 1920s Hollywood, but he hasn't listened to what people have told him. People of this lost era are treated like primitive creatures by him. He's only condescending to the past.
Babylon is an ambitious picture, but it is also anambitious film. The film opens in 1926, as silent films and their stars were still going strong, and ends in the early 1930s, when many of the old players were left behind by thetalkies. It was a good subject when Stanley Donen, Gene Kelly, Betty Comden and Adolph Green were involved in Singin' in the Rain. The film is not shaped like a big pile of movies. Three hours is a long time. During the movie's first scene, an elephant being brought in for a Hollywood mogul's big shindig squirts projectile poop into the camera lens, like a toast. The point is that these early Hollywood types were selfish and extravagant. We are invited to party with them and watch them at the same time.
The movie's most sympathetic character is an outsider who desperately wants in and is a long time Los Angeleno. Even though he has to start at the bottom, he knows he has to wrangle elephants. He leads us into the mogul's mansion, where we see all manner of semi-naked boys and girlies dancing with abandon and doing purportedly unspeakable things to one another, even though it's all really rather decorous. Streamers fly; champagne zings through the air; a jazz band of cool-looking Black musicians tootles the brassy, thumping notes of the score. We are drawn into this party with one long swoop. If you are with the wrong person, this is where you will be told, "Look, this is a single take." Say what you will about Chazelle and Sandgren, they know how to communicate with each other.
There are the best movies of the year.
Love is in the air and people are having a good time. As he tries to manage all the celebratory anarchy, he meets his dream girl, a woman with an unruly halo of hair and so much inner chaos that it spills out around her. Her feet are shod in old fashioned lace-up boots and she is dressed in a length of silk wrapped around her torso. The result is a kind of willful inaccuracy that isn't inventive or evocative. The star-in-her-own-mind talks her way into the party and immediately makes for a big mountain of cocaine heaped on a silver platter. The manic dream girl wasn't invented yesterday, but that didn't stop the man from loving her immediately.
By the end of the movie, you might be thinking, "Oh, good, it's almost over" Would you be right? Brad Pitt plays Jack Conrad, a rakish but principled silent-movie star who is rejected by his audience once he is required to speak. He squints his way through the movie with a smirk on his face. There is an endless, show-offy section in which Nellie, who had proved to be a natural in the wild, wild west of silent filmmakers, can't perform on a soundstage. A charismatic Black bandleader, Sidney Palmer, is turned into a star by a man who has moved a few rungs up the movie-business ladder. The racism of early Hollywood is something that is correct. Elinor St. John, Jean Smart's gossip reporter, wears a series of head dresses to reflect on the high jinks around her. She told Jack Conrad that despite his career being over, he has sealed his reputation in film history. In her burr, she says, "But in 100 years, when you and I are both dead, you'll be alive again."
It was the best movie performance of the year.
It makes no sense in the context of how film was treated in the days before we became hip to preservation to have a speech like that. At least 75 percent of silent films have been lost or destroyed, and at the time people made these films thought of them as ephemeral entertainment. Even if Elinor St. John were a real person, she wouldn't have had any faith in the film's lasting power.
The path of the man is only occasionally linked with that of the woman. While she lives only for partying and gambling, he looks at her with lovesickness. She doesn't have a lot of depth or characteristics. Many of the characters in Babylon are references to real-life figures. Even though Fatty Arbuckle was wrongly accused of the rape and murder of young aspiring actress Virginia Rappe, his career was destroyed when he was depicted as a bully in a film. The most captivating performance in the movie is from Li Jun Li, who plays a character named Lady Fay Zhu, an out-in-the-open lesbian and Jill of all trades who makes a Zowie entrance in a tuxedo. The entire movie could not be about her.
It is a manic sprawl that only celebrates cinema. It is about prurience, dumb sensation, self-esteem and willful knowledge of history. As big screen projects become harder and harder to mount, ambition in filmmakers is a good thing. It felt like something of an openhearted enterprise if La La Land was expansive and imperfect. First Man tried to capture the sense of joy that can be found in science, even though it was too showy for its own good. It's not a better thing than Babylon. There is a selection of great images of cinema in the closing sequence. It's cinema! When it is terrible, it is wonderful. In the end of the film, a reptilian mobster played by Tobey Maguire invites guests into a dark place with the words, "Welcome to the asshole of Los Angeles." We have been there for the last three hours.
We'd love to hear from you at letters@Time.com.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
