A Patriot MIM-104 surface-to-air missile system.
A Patriot MIM-104 surface-to-air missile system. (U.S. Army)

There are items on the Ukrainian weapons wish list.

Multiple U.S. officials are quoted by CNN as saying that the US is close to supplying advanced surface-to-air missile systems to Ukranian. The number and variant of the system have not been disclosed yet, and the supply still needs to be signed off by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and President Biden.

The Ukrainians have a top priority when it comes to securing advanced air defense systems.

The only long-range surface-to-air missiles that had been delivered to Ukraine were the S-300 batteries from Slovakia. Improved Ukrainian air defense capability has become a priority for Western government officials as Russian strikes on Ukrainian power infrastructure have caused large sections of the country to go dark.

Local residents watch as a bombed building is dismantled in Borodyanka, Kyiv region, Ukraine, on Dec. 13.
Local residents watch as a bombed building is dismantled in Borodyanka, Kyiv region, Ukraine, on Dec. 13. (Andrew Kravchenko/AP)

The NATO arsenal has the most capable long-range surface-to-air missiles, with a 99 mile range against aircraft and cruise missiles. The smaller version of the missile defense system is almost entirely designed to intercept missiles. Both types are usually used to defend American military installations. The Rzeszow-Jasionka airport, a major logistics hub on the Polish-Ukraine border through which a large amount of Western military aid flows to Ukraine, has been defended by two batteries ofPatriots.

Washington is worried about the toll Russia has taken on the country's power supply, as evidenced by the planned supply of missiles. The mayor of Kyiv warned that it might be necessary to evacuate the capital if the weather gets cold.

Iran is said to be willing to send short-range missiles to replenish Russia's stock. The Ukrainians have air defense systems that are designed to shoot down this type of missile. The system has had some high-profile failures, possibly due to operator error, but it has been able to intercept over 100 tactical missiles fired by the Iranians in Yemen.

U.S. Army MIM-104 Patriots, surface-to-air missile system launchers, are pictured at Rzeszow-Jasionka Airport on March 24, 2022. (Reuters)

The Biden administration is increasing the sophistication of the systems they are sending to Ukraine in response to the Russian bombardment campaign, according to a professor. A high level of U.S. confidence in the military performance of Ukraine is shown in the announcement. The U.S. security assistance was held back by the fear that if Kyiv fell, any sensitive military hardware would be taken by Moscow and shared with other American adversaries. The continued existence of Ukraine as a nation is being supported more and more by Western hard power.

While it is unclear which variant of the Patriot system will be given to Kyiv, a major question arises if it is the PAC2 that will prevent the Ukrainians from targeting aircraft flying in Russian airspace.

Russian strategic bombers have been flying well outside of Ukrainian airspace for a long time. A one-way flight is made possible by the current air defense network in Kyiv. The Kremlin's warplanes could be threatened while they remain over Russia.

A Tupolev Tu-22M3 bomber performs during the International Army Games 2016, in Dubrovichi outside Ryazan, Russia, on Aug. 5, 2016. (Maxim Shemetov/Reuters)

Another constant of this war is that Washington considers necessary what it deems too risky.

According to a recent report in the Wall Street Journal, U.S.-supplied High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems had software modifications that would prevent them from firing at coordinates inside Russia.

According to a senior official from a NATO member-state, Washington's technical limitations on the HIMARS were more of a public relations exercise than a severe logistical handicap. It is intended to signal to the Russians that American strategic weapons aren't going to be used to hit them.

According to the Journal, the Biden administration is wary of a third-party nation giving Ukraine with ATACMS, something that it could not do without U.S. consent. The official said that even if the Ukrainians used another multiple-launch rocket platform, they still have to get Washington's approval. disabling him is pointless.

The condition of how and where U.S weaponry can be used in this war has already been violated. The same can be said of Putin's "red lines" of escalation.

The Russian oblast of Belgorod is said to have been hit with American-made anti-radiation missiles. The missiles were sent as part of a U.S. aid package to Ukraine, but never explicitly acknowledged by the Pentagon.

A view of an AGM-88 HARM high-speed anti-radiation missile mounted beneath the wing of a 37th Tactical Fighter Wing F-4G Phantom II "Wild Weasel" aircraft. (U.S. Air Force)

There is no evidence that U.S. supplies of missiles have dried up. The Kremlin has not raised a public fuss about the attacks because they fear that by doing so they will encourage more hawks in Russia's security establishment to retaliate against NATO.

The strategic communications specialists in both Washington and Moscow don't have to worry about the defensive weapons systems being a problem.

Power grids and substations are not aggressive or escalatory. Enhancing Ukraine's air defense capability isn't just about protecting Ukrainians anymore because of Russia's bombardment of civilian areas and critical infrastructure. Hundreds of Western diplomats and their staff live and work in Ukrainian cities. Their lives are in danger when Russian Kalibr missiles or Iranian Shahed-136 drones are fired at them. Policy planners have an easier time making the argument for bolstering Ukraine's air defense capability.

Keeping Ukraine supplied with the extremely expensive and sophisticatedPatriots will be a key issue for Western Logisticians. Missiles cost between $3 million and $6 million to make. The missile system is very heavy and difficult to move. Western trainers have remarked on the shallow learning curve Ukrainians have so far demonstrated when it comes to using new military technology.

An officer in the U.S. Army told Yahoo News that the U.S. had to teach a six-week period of instruction for the Ukrainian crew. The U.S. trained both in under three weeks because the Ukrainians were willing to learn. The Ukrainians can learn in as little as eight to 10 weeks if training hasn't already begun.