The universe is governed by four fundamental forces: electromagnetism, the weak nuclear force, the strong nuclear force, and gravity. The first three are described by quantum mechanics. Physicists find gravity to be the biggest challenge. The theory describes how gravity works for planets, but it doesn't apply at all scales.

There are gaps when scientists try to apply General Relativity at the quantum scale and to the universe as a whole. According to a new study led by Simon Fraser University, an international team of researchers tested General Relativity on the largest of scales and concluded that it may need a tweaking or two. Scientists could use this method to solve some of the biggest mysteries.

The team included researchers from Simon Fraser, the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation at the University of Pompey, and the Center for Particle Cosmology at the University of Pennsylvania. The results of their work were published in a paper in Nature Astronomy.

Prof. Albert Einstein delivering the 11th Josiah Willard Gibbs lecture at the Carnegie Institute of Technology on Dec. 28, 1934. Credit: AP Photo

The force of gravity would cause the Universe to contract if Einstein's field equations were correct. While Einstein resisted this idea initially and tried to propose a mysterious force that held the Universe in equilibrium, the observations of Hubble in the 1920s show that the Universe is expanding. The vacuum of space is filled with energy that goes undetected because conventional methods can only measure changes in energy, according to quantum theory.

The Hubble Space Telescope pushed the boundaries of astronomy in the 90s. Calculating the time it took for objects to appear over 13 billion light-years is called the Hubble Deep Fields. The rate of expansion has accelerated over the last 4 billion years. The old cosmological constant problem is when gravity is weak on the scales of the universe.

The lead-author and co-author summarized the issue in an article. They explained that the problem comes down to one question.

“[W]hether the vacuum energy actually gravitates – exerting a gravitational force and changing the expansion of the universe. If yes, then why is its gravity so much weaker than predicted? If the vacuum does not gravitate at all, what is causing the cosmic acceleration? We don’t know what dark energy is, but we need to assume it exists in order to explain the universe’s expansion. Similarly, we also need to assume there is a type of invisible matter presence, dubbed dark matter, to explain how galaxies and clusters evolved to be the way we observe them today.”

The LCDM cosmological model incorporates Dark Energy (L) with the “cold” theories of Dark Matter. Credit: Alex Mittelmann/Wikimedia

The existence of Dark Energy is part of a standard model of the universe called the Lambda Cold Dark Matter model. The mass-energy density of the Universe is 70% Dark Energy, 25% Dark Matter, and 5% Luminous Matter. The model assumes that most of the Universe is made up of invisible forces.

The Universe as a whole may need some modifications in order to be explained. Astronomers found that measuring the rate of expansion in different ways produced different values. The problem is called the Hubble tension.

Two values of the Hubble Constant are at odds. The number predicted by the LCDM model is similar to the light left over from the Big bang. The expansion rate is measured by the stars that explode in the distant universe.

There are many ideas for modifying the model. The MOND is a modified take on the law of universal gravity that eliminates the existence of dark matter. Astronomers have been looking at how spacetime is altered by the presence of gravity for over 100 years. These tests have become even more extreme in recent decades, which include how black holes affect stars or how light is altered.

An illustration of cosmic expansion. Credit: NASA’s GSFC Conceptual Image Lab

For the sake of their study, Pogosian and his colleagues used a model called the Bayesian inference, which is used to calculate the probability of a Theorem as more data is introduced.

The basic laws of general relativity are being tested by a team of scientists. We wondered if modifying Einstein's theory could help resolve some of the open problems of the universe. For the first time, we are going to investigate three aspects of GR at the same time to see if it's correct. The expansion of the Universe, the effects of gravity on light, and the effects of gravity on matter were some of the things that happened.

Their results showed a few discrepancies with Einstein's predictions. They found that modifying the theory of gravity was not easy to resolve the Hubble tension problem. The force may have been present during the early Universe if the former is true. When protons and electrons first came together to make hydrogen, it was 370,000 years ago.

There are several possibilities, ranging from a special form of Dark Matter, an early type of Dark Energy, or primordial magnetic fields. This latest study shows that there may be a revision of the most widely-accepted model. They said, "Pocsian and Koyama."

“[O]ur study has demonstrated that it is possible to test the validity of general relativity over cosmological distances using observational data. While we haven’t yet solved the Hubble problem, we will have a lot more data from new probes in a few years. This means that we will be able to use these statistical methods to continue tweaking general relativity, exploring the limits of modifications, to pave the way to resolving some of the open challenges in cosmology.”

There is further reading on nature astronomy.