play
Why teams won't wear OneLove armbands in Qatar (1:07)

After a joint statement from England, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, and Switzerland, it was confirmed that their players wouldn't wear the OneLove armband. There is a time and a place for this.

5:10 PM ET

Just days into the World Cup, Infantino's desire to let football take center stage and focus on the football hasn't panned out.

There was a ban on alcohol in stadiums. There were a lot of empty seats at the game as the host nation lost to the South American nation. On Monday, a major row betweenFIFA and seven European nations has ended with those countries abandoning plans for their captains to wear a special anti-discrimination armband at the last minute

The World Cup teams have stopped wearing the "One Love" slogan.

Just over three hours before England kicked off against Iran in their Group B opener at Khalifa International Stadium, the countries involved -- England, Wales, Germany, Belgium, Netherlands, Switzerland and Danes -- issued a joint statement saying they would not wear the OneLove armband.

Even though the yellow card sanction was communicated prior to the past 48 hours, the tournament continues to be overshadowed by off-field issues even after the matches have started.

What is the OneLove armband?

Various European nations held talks about whether an agreement could be reached for a collective gesture during international matches.

According to sources, the Netherlands Football Association, along with seven other countries, are in contact with 10 others. The OneLove campaign was fully supported by the organization, and it had also approved the use of the armbands during the September international window, for those associations who contacted them.

When the same plan was applied to the World Cup, there were no discussions held over possible repercussions because the same plan was approved quickly. According to sources, the regulations for a Euros are fairly broad and would have given guidance on the use of "special equipment."

So why was it such an issue at the World Cup?

There are concerns over the treatment of the LGBTQIA+ community in the Gulf state. Same-sex relationships are not legal in the country and in some cases can be punished with death.

England's captain, Harry Kane, was forced into the FIFA-approved 'No Discrimination' armband, which will be used by every team instead of the OneLove effort previously championed by several European nations. Visionhaus/Getty Images

The colors of the OneLove heart were red, black, green, and blue, and they were used to represent all genders and sexual identities. The seven nations that qualified for the tournament made it clear a long time before the event that they were going to wear the captain's hat, and it appeared as though the only consequence was a fine.

There was a rumour that a yellow card sanction for every captain was on the way. They would be shown a yellow card at the start of the game if they wore the captain's hat. There was little time for discussion among the nations taking part in this action because FIFA did not publicly confirm things as accurate.

The position of Neuer on the field makes it less likely that he will get a yellow card. Even though he wasn't enthusiastic about discussing the situation yet again, van Dijk still maintained his support. When the issue was privately believed to have been solved, Harry Kane confirmed his intention to wear the captain's hat.

play

Mark reacted to the news that players wouldn't wear the OneLove armband after it was confirmed that sanctions would be taken against a player.

There was no mention of Kane being booked for the gesture as of Sunday evening, but sources have said that the English FA had been in talks with the world's governing body. It was clear that the sporting sanction was too much of a risk when conversations continued with the national associations on Monday morning.

If booked in all seven matches, each captain could be banned twice during the tournament, but they would have to walk a fine line to avoid committing another bookable offense. If a player is booked in the first two games of the group stage, they won't play in the third game. He would be able to return for the last 16 if his team advanced, but he would not be allowed to play in the semifinals or final if he was booked at that time.

So what does it mean for the rest of the tournament and the ongoing political backdrop?

The fact that Monday's about-face only adds to suspicions that the two countries are only interested in promoting inclusion if it's on their terms. The "No Discrimination" campaign was announced on the eve of the tournament. They told Belgium to remove the "love" message from their shirts with no room for discussion.

You can watch the LaLiga, Bundesliga, and more on the U.S. based on your location.

The nations are unhappy. Sources say that multiple associations agree that the threat of sporting sanctions is an unprecedented demonstration of power. Those nations should not have been surprised according to the organization.

The captain of each team is required to wear the captain's armband for the final competition. According to a media release on Monday,FIFA wants to put football to the benefit of society by supporting good and legitimate causes, but it has to be done within the framework of the competition regulations which are known to everyone.

It is an off-field problem that shows the tensions between the values of a World Cup and the culture of a country. Our players and coaches are upset. They are strong supporters of inclusion. The row may not be over.