It is not possible to sell sensitive technology to any company in any country in the world.

The core purpose of the tool is to reverse malicious software. We should assume that the tool will be used to improve the security of the product.

A person who tried Corellium in the past, who asked to remain anonymous because they were not allowed to speak to the press, says that "given what's happening in the world today, you shouldn't be dealing with Russian companies"

The decision to work with a company based in Russia was made by the CEO.

We still strive to provide the best software and services and try to keep good relationships with our customers all over the world. We will continue to do our job and make the world a better place.

Adrian said that it was not surprising that groups interested in creating exploits would use a platform for research.

He says that Apple created the need for platforms by not giving the tools, access, and transparency the market needs and desires.

There are danger zones.

Alex Stamos, who was an expert witness for Corellium in the lawsuit against Apple, is from a country that is seen as controversial by most people in the West.

During testimony he provided in the lawsuit between Apple and Corellium, the director of the internet observatory said he didn't think it was ethical to sell exploits to Saudi Arabia.

Stamos had doubts about DarkMatter's ability to sell products to the United Arab Emirate. Stamos said that the U.S. has been shown to use malicious software to spy on journalists.

In response to the document's revelations, Stamos says he doesn't think "it's appropriate for Apple to use copyright law to try to stop security research."

The logos of alleged customers and companies are included in the document. The logo of Azimuth, a provider of advanced hacking tools to the intelligence and law enforcement agencies of the so called Five Eyes, is included in the document. The Centre for Strategic Infocomm Technologies of Singapore, or CSIT, as well as the logo of an academic institution in Saudi Arabia called the Center ofExcellence in Information Assurance, housed at the King Saud University are some of the logos.

CSIT executives did not reply to the request. The email that was sent to the organization was titled "invitation to Corellium" and was shown in the document. The COEIA did not reply.

There is a legal battle going on. The companies appeared before the Eleventh Circuit of the US Court of Appeals in Florida. The lawyer for Apple argued that the product wasn't fair use because it was just a slightly altered version of the mobile operating system. Kevin Russell said that the product helps users understand the functioning of the Apple operating system.

He doesn't think there's a dispute that the purpose of the product is to explore the software's unpatched features. The subject of a different statute is what people do with that knowledge.