The universe has gravity as well. The most common fundamental force is the one that presents the biggest challenges to physicists.

The recent detection of ripples in the fabric of space and time is the culmination of many years of observational tests. There are gaps in our understanding when we try to apply it to small distances or when we try to describe the whole universe.

Einstein's theory on the largest of scales has been tested by our new study. The results suggest that the theory of general relativity may need to be changed on this scale, as we believe our approach may one day help resolve some of the biggest mysteries in the universe.

Faulty model?

The vacuum is filled with energy. Our devices can only measure changes in energy, so we don't notice it.

The empty space is pushed apart by the vacuum energy. It was discovered in 1998 that the expansion of the universe is speeding up. The amount of dark energy needed to explain the acceleration is much smaller than what quantum theory predicts.

The big question is whether the vacuum energy actually gravitates and exerts a gravitational force.

Why is its gravity so weak? Why is the vacuum not moving?

We don't know what dark energy is but we need to assume it exists in order to explain the universe's expansion We need to assume that there is a type of invisible matter presence called dark matter that explains how clusters evolved to be the way we see them today.

Scientists believe there is 70% dark energy, 25% dark matter and 5% ordinary matter in the universe. The model has been able to fit all the data collected over the past two decades.

The fact that most of the universe is made up of dark forces and substances, taking odd values that don't make sense, has prompted many physicists to wonder if Einstein's theory of gravity needs modification.

A new twist appeared a few years ago when it became apparent that different ways of measuring the rate of expansion of the universe gave different answers.

Two values of the Hubble constant are at odds. The number predicted by the LCDM model is related to the light left over from the Bigbang. The expansion rate is measured by observing the stars that explode.

Cosmic microwave background from NASA

Cosmic microwave background. (Image credit: NASA)

There are many theories about how to explain the Hubble Tension. Alternative gravity theories are included in the list.

Digging for answers

If the universe obeys the rules, we can design tests. General relativity describes gravity as bending the pathways along which light and matter travel. Light rays and matter should be bent by gravity.

The basic laws of general relativity were tested by a team of scientists. Modification of Einstein's theory could help resolve some of the open problems of the universe.

We are going to investigate three aspects of general relativity at the same time in order to find out if it's correct. The expansion of the universe, the effects of gravity on light and the effects of gravity on matter were some of the things that happened.

The computer model we used to reconstruct the gravity of the universe was based on three parameters. The parameters could be estimated using the background data from the Planck satellite, supernova catalogues, and observations of the shapes and distribution of distant galaxies. The prediction of the LCDM model is similar to Einstein's model.

There were hints of a mismatch with Einstein's prediction. It's possible that gravity works differently on large scales, and that general relativity may need to be changed.

The Hubble tension problem can only be solved by changing the theory of gravity. A special form of dark matter, an early type of dark energy or primordial magnetic fields would need to be added to the model in order for the full solution to be achieved. Maybe there's a systematic error in the data.

The validity of general relativity can be tested using observational data. We will have a lot more data from new probes in the next few years.

We will be able to use these statistical methods to continue tweaking general relativity and explore the limits of modifications to resolve some of the open challenges.

Under a Creative Commons license, this article is re-posted. The article is open in a new tab.