We often talk about how we can reduce harmful gases in the atmosphere that cause global warming. Adaptation is a pressing climate concept in Africa. The negative effects of global warming include floods and food shortages. Africa is most vulnerable to the effects of global warming and adaptation is a critical step for it and other developing regions.
People who have herded cattle and derived their identity from animals must embrace crop farming or bee keeping to survive degraded rangeland. People in low-lying nations are leaving their homes and wetlands to escape the rising sea level. Shifts in livelihood, attitudes and heritage are part of the adaptation process.
AsCOP 27 participants converge in Northern Africa to discuss ways to combat climate change, my concern is that funding questions will be more about research than adaptation. Only $1 is spent on adaptation for every $18 spent on Mitigation. This isn't sufficient. Fixing the funding issue is one of the topics discussed. Many people don't understand why adaptation remains underfunded. Who decides the agenda for climate-risk research? The designs and distribution of adaptation funds are influenced by these agendas.
Africans don't know how the money should be used. This can't stay the same.
Climate change research on Africa has been tracked by researchers from the African Climate and Development Initiative. Funding for Africa-related issues has come from the U.K., the U.S. and the E.U. Governments. Research institutions based in Europe and North America have received 78 percent of the funds allocated by these sources. They gave African-based institutions only a small amount of their funds to study climate change.
The funding agencies set the parameters for what projects they will fund. Many of the proposals call for non-Africans to serve as experts and in leadership roles over Africans who are more suited to run projects. The idea that Africans can't design solutions to address their own needs continues. It's possible that ill-designed projects don't meet the needs of local populations.
If investments end up in low priority actions or the wrong interventions, the vulnerability of communities can be worsened. Maladaptation would be caused by this. Western funding for climate related research in Africa is 2.3 percent of total funds. According to the climate finance from grants, debt and equity tracked in the country, only a small percentage of the funds have been directed towards adaptation. The economy relies on rain- dependent agriculture despite the fact that 89 percent of the land is arid and semi arid.
Western nations contributed to climate change through industrialization, but African nations suffer the most from a crisis they did not create. In 2020, climate finance flows from both domestic and international grants, debts and equity in Africa were $30 billion making up for only 11 percent of the $277 billion needed annually to adequately address climate Since the climate crisis is a daily reality for Africa, they must adequately invest their own resources into addressing climate risks to protect their own citizens.
Some think that African nations don't prioritize climate budgets because of pressing poverty and high foreign debt. If Africans want to eradicate poverty and ensure sustainable development, they need to take a more proactive approach to adaptation finance. What do they do?
Innovative approaches to adaptation finance should be more emphasized at a national level. Debt-for-nature swaps can be used to invest in adaptation projects. This is where a debtor country is allowed substantial discounts on the debt owed to its creditor (which may be a creditor country, a creditor commercial bank or an environmental nongovernmental organization acting as a broker) in exchange for investments in conserve and protect the environment. The Seychelles was able to restructure its foreign debt in exchange for its commitments to protecting the ocean. The protection of 32 percent of the waters of the island nation was completed by 2020.
Private-sector financing is needed for adaptation projects. Fourteen percent of the climate finance in Africa in 2020 was from the private sector. Private-sector players want more insurance products and partial guarantees from public funds to minimize their risks when investing in adaptation projects. A favorable environment for the private sector to invest in adaptation projects is dependent upon credible local research.
You can sign up for Scientific American's newsletters.
Investing their own contributions to climate-related financial products will maximize the effects of development aid. African leaders will have a better chance to decide how the funds should be used. The Africa Adaptation Acceleration Program aims to increase investments in adaptation finance from African national governments, impact investors, foundations and other innovative sources. The long-term viability of excessive reliance on donor funds is unsustainable for the African continent.
Climate research agendas should be shaped by equitable partnerships between the Global North and South. Power relations are affected by money. Direct control of project resources is one way to balance power. Providing an equal amount of finance to northern institutions for climate research on Africa to that spent on research institutions in African countries encourages research equity and the empowerment of African researchers. Results-based financing requires independent verification of achieving previously agreed terms to maintain transparency and accountability. It helps strengthen domestic institutions by giving them more independence to achieve their goals.
Many adaptation projects have parameters such as co-design and locally-led. Funding and partners that encourage local research can help meet these goals. The approach allows for key stakeholders to be involved in the project from the beginning. Ownership and sustainable outcomes are perpetuated by this. African governments should take up the challenge of investing their own resources in climate research to inform local adaptation solutions.
The views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those ofScientific American.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
