It was updated Oct 11, 2022, 10:48am.

The Supreme Court declined Tuesday to hear a case that would have granted constitutional rights to embryo and fetus, as well as allowing anti-abortion advocates to impose greater limits on abortion.

US-abortion-demonstration

The 49th annual March for Life will take place in Washington, D.C. on January 21.

AFP via Getty Images

The Supreme Court decided not to take up the case.

The lawsuit challenged Rhode Island's law that upholds abortion rights and argued that fetuses and embryos are entitled to due process and equal protection under the constitution.

In light of the June ruling in Jackson Women's Health Organization, the anti-abortion challengers requested the court to take up the case.

The Rhode Island Supreme Court upheld the lower state court's ruling that the case did not have standing because the fetus did not have due process rights.

Legal rights for fetus, known as "fetal personhood" protections, are the next step beyond abortion bans and would mean that abortion could be classified as murder.

The lead attorney has yet to respond to the request.

PLAY Forbes Business Major U.S. Airport Websites Hit With Suspected Russian Cyberattacks Read More Forbes Global CEO Conference 2022: Key Insights And Highlights Read More The TikTok Butter Board Trend: Here Are The Dangers Read More Read More Google Doodle Celebrates Legendary Musician Tito Puente Read More Sales Fall Again In September At China SUV Leader Great Wall Read More 1/1 Skip Ad Continue watching after the ad Loading PodsVisit Advertiser websiteGO TO PAGE Major U.S. Airport Websites Hit With Suspected Russian Cyberattacks

The laws regarding abortion are different from other laws. In their petition to the Supreme Court, the challengers asked if unborn humans have any rights under the constitution. All unborn human beings should be considered to be persona non grata in the eyes of the United States Constitution.

What We Don’t Know

The Fetal Personhood issue could still be considered by the Supreme Court. The 6-3 conservative court didn't comment on the case on Tuesday, so it's not clear if they'd be willing to hear a similar challenge.

Key Background

Fetal personhood rights have become a bigger issue since the Supreme Court's decision in June. According to the New York Times, the personhood language in state law that includes the fetus regardless of the woman's age can now have more practical consequences. Fetals are now considered to be dependents who are eligible for tax credits in Georgia. Fetal personhood protections could have far-reaching effects, including criminalizing in-vitro fertilization, birth control methods and abortions due to medical emergencies, according to abortion rights advocates. While people who get abortions are shielded from criminal liability in abortion bans that have been enacted so far, abortion rights advocates believe fetal personhood laws could lead to pregnant people being charged as well.

Is a fetus a person? There is an anti- abortion strategy that says yes. The New York Times is a daily newspaper in the United States.

Is a fetus a person? The next big abortion fight centers will deal with fetal rights.

When Fetuses Gain Personhood: Understanding the Impact on abortion, contraceptives, medical treatment, criminal law, child support, and beyond.

It has been 100 days since the Wade decision.