Bill Barr, Donald Trump's former Attorney General, doesn't think the former president's children should have been included in the lawsuit.
His explanation to Fox News was that it was an insult to Donald Trump Jr. and his siblings.
Donald Trump and his family have been accused of engaging in real estate business practices that often undervalued and overvalued assets.
The charges against the Trumps were a political hit job that was without merit, according to Barr.
The fact that she tried to drag the children into this was a gross overreach on her part according to Barr.
The former AG suggested that the three middle-aged executives in the Trump company didn't have the smarts to read contracts or real estate documents.
The children aren't expected in the real world to do their own due diligence and have it reviewed independently
Bill Barr tells Fox that NYAG Letitia James "grossly overreaches when she tries to drag the children into this" because Eric, Don Jr., and Ivanka, are not "expected in the real world to due their own due diligence." pic.twitter.com/dIyFhe9XrO
— nikki mccann ramírez (@NikkiMcR) September 21, 2022
Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump were insulted by Barr because they were involved in the former president's business dealings.
Barr compares the Trump children's (who all have held positions in his company) level of involvement in Trump's business dealings to that of a parent buying their kid a car. pic.twitter.com/zVLEynVHLe
— nikki mccann ramírez (@NikkiMcR) September 21, 2022
There was a day of mocking Barr's portrayal of Helen Lovejoy.
Barr had a different definition of childhood when dealing with non-billionaires children.
The law still required James to file a lawsuit if Barr insisted that the Trump children were defenseless.
The article was first published on HuffPost.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
