The old pension scheme was being considered for the employees of the Punjab government.
Punjab will become the third state to have reverted to the OPS if the proposal is approved.
Some employee unions are in favor of the U-turn.
The defined benefit system was retired by many countries. Huge losses were suffered by governments due to mounting pension liability. The benefits of the new system will be realised by those who joined after January 1, 2004.
There is a decision by the Punjab government.
All you need to know is how the move affects government employees and retirees.
The old pension scheme is used by government employees.
The old pension scheme is used to manage the pensions of central government employees who joined the workforce before January 1, 2004.
50 percent of the last drawn basic pay plus dearness allowance at retirement or average emoluments earned in the last ten months of service is the formula for pensions. The employee should have been with the company for at least a decade.
According to the former member of the Central Board of Trustees, the Dearness Allowance can go up. The government's pension liabilities will continue to rise.
The family pension is paid out to family members of the deceased retirees.
There were other benefits as well. Employees didn't have to pay into the pension. The government contributes to the fund. Upadhyay says that earlier employer contribution was hidden.
It's not surprising that many employees favor the restoration of the old pension system given the assured payouts, no deduction towards pension from their salaries and financial security for their families after their death.
There are tax benefits that come with investing in a new product.
The new pension system for central government employees was introduced.
The Centre introduced a new pension system for its employees after January 1, 2004. Most state governments switched to the new regime.
The shift was necessitated by the pension liability of the governments. It wouldn't be feasible for the exchequer to implement it again, according to the founder of Ladder7 Financial Advisors.
In a research note published in March this year, the State Bank of India said that the pay-as-you-go-scheme is an unfunded pension scheme.
The pension liability of state governments has increased over the years. The 12-year period ended in FY22 had a compounded annual growth rate of 34% for all the state governments. The research note said that the pension outgo as a percentage of revenue receipts is around 13 percent for all states combined.
The pension payouts have been increased due to an increase in the life expectancy of citizens.
What is the work of the government employees?
Employees of the government are required to contribute 10 percent of their salary towards their retirement fund under the National Pension System. Private sector employees are allowed to work on a voluntary basis.
The framework for private employees is more conservative than the framework for them. In the case of the latter, the maximum exposure is 75 percent, while for government employees it's 50 percent.
They can withdraw up to 60 percent of the fund as a tax-free lump-sum, while the remaining 40 percent has to be converted into annuities for a lifetime of income.
The market-driven nature of the NPS makes it different from the one that guarantees a certainPayout. The NPS is favored by rising equity markets but prone to short-term volatility.
It works in the favor of the employee and also relieves the employer of the burden of assured payouts since it is a retirement vehicle.
Does the National Pension Service provide an assured pension?
Defined contribution and not a defined benefit scheme is the difference between the two.
In the case of government employees, both the employer and employee contribute to the fund.
Employees can make larger contributions to the fund if they want higher pensions.
The lump-sum payouts and lifetime pension income are determined by the market.
The size of the annuities and annuity income depends on the performance of your funds, the interest rates prevalent at the time of buying and payouts you choose.
Depending on your exposure to debt and equity. If it's heavily skewed towards debt, it might be smaller. It will be bigger if you choose a higher allocation. It is important when you start investing. According to Sadpanago, if the employee was 25 when her contributions began, by 60 she will have a huge amount of money.
Since the pension is not predictable, is it better for employees who are risk averse?
The guaranteedPayout feature is attractive if you have no appetite for risk.
Employees don't have to make contributions to their pension under the rules. The main incentives for taking up government jobs were the guaranteed pensions. There was no need to build a retirement fund. Life expectancy has gone up and it's unsustainable for governments.
It looks like an easy way to make money for employees. According to experts, the way forward for Greece and other European nations is through the use of the National Pension System. It is better for the environment.
The government bears the risk of longevity and inflation, which is good for employees. The replacement rate would be less than 50 percent and would not be enough. The replacement rate is the percentage of your current income needed to live the same lifestyle after retirement. "This wouldn't be enough, so this would not be enough," says Chandrashekhar.
Pension fund managers believe that the more remunerative pension instrument over the long term could be the New Pension System.
As those who joined in 2004 are yet to retire, government employees in India have not yet experienced the benefits of the defined contribution system.
He thinks that NPS will deliver a larger retirement fund and higher pension due to its better returns.
“NPS offers much more flexibility and the customer is in control of her destiny. Be it equity or debt, professional pension fund managers can ensure better returns and bigger corpus for retirement,” says Shukla.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
