The election reforms used by the state of Alaska could be a model for the rest of the country, as well as scrutiny from those who believe the changes may favor one party more than another.

After the January 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, Murkowski voted to impeach Trump. Kelly Tshibaka received less than 40% of the vote in the nonpartisan primary, but still received the most votes of any candidate. A few of the other candidates got the majority of the vote.

Senate candidate Kelly Tshibaka with Donald Trump during a rally in Anchorage, Alaska, July 9. (Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images)

If Alaska had conducted its primaries the way it has in the past, it would have been a different story. It is a mistake to see the new system as hostile to either Republicans or Democrats.

It doesn't mean that Trump-endorsed candidates don't win. That is who the majority of voters want. The Institute for Political Innovation, a group that has pushed for the changes, said that it just means all November voters have a voice.

The new system in Alaska prevents a minority of voters in either party from eliminating a candidate with broad appeal before most voters cast their ballots.

Voters in Alaska approved a system in 2020 which merged multiple party primaries into one contest. All voters cast their ballot in one primary last week.

The four people who got the most votes advanced to the fall election. More than 69,000 votes have been counted, more than double the number of votes she received in the Republican primary and more than the number of votes she received in the 2010 Republican primary.

After losing the 2010 primary to a more right-wing Republican, Joe Miller, she ran as a write-in candidate and won the general election.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski at the Capitol on July 21. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The general election was one of the changes Alaskans made in 2020 The winner of that contest will be decided by ranked-choice voting, meaning that the winner will get more support from the voters than the other candidates will.

Ranked-choice voting has received a lot of attention in the last few years. Last week was not related to ranked choice.

It is the combination of nonpartisan primaries with ranked-choice voting that will do the most to depolarize American politics and empower politicians to fix problems according to reform advocates.

The most powerful election reform is the combination of nonpartisan primaries and ranked-choice voting according to the executive director of Unite America. According to a report published by Unite America, 8 out of 10 members of Congress are effectively chosen by about 10% of voters.

More Americans are realizing that they have to fix the system if they want reform.

Sarah Palin at the Conservative Political Action Conference earlier this year. (Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Some Republicans in Alaska don't like the voting reforms. The former governor of Alaska has been a critic. Even though she finished second in the first round of voting, she still called the new system crazy andcockamamie.

Democrat Mary Peltola had 38% of the vote, but she was trailed by fellow Republican Nick Begich who had 29%. If enough of the voters listed her as their second choice, she could win the election.

There will likely be attempts to repeal parts of the new system in the next legislative session, according to Republicans in the state legislature. The nonpartisan primary and ranked-choice system was passed despite complaints from right-wing activists that it would favor her politically.

Democrats in Nevada are against the push by reformers to put the same system in place. Both Democrats and the governor are against the changes. Democrats in Nevada led the legal challenge to stop the issue from being decided by voters, but the state Supreme Court ruled in June that the reforms would be allowed on the ballot.

The nonpartisan primary and ranked-choice system will have to be approved by Nevada voters in two separate referendums in order to become state law.

Gov. Steve Sisolak, D-Nev. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images)

The status quo is not threatened by these reforms if we don't attract political opposition.

It's understandable that both political parties don't like the idea of removing party primaries. The way in which they have chosen a nominee for every political office since the 1970s is the way that party bosses lost control of.

Public discontent with the political status quo is increasing. Half of Americans think the country's system of government should have major reforms, and 8% think it should be completely replaced, according to a New York Times/ Siena College poll. 29% of people think at least a few changes are needed.

According to the results of a recent poll conducted by Frank Luntz for Unite America, 65 percent of the respondents supported a nonpartisan primary.

The best way for Republicans and Democrats to reduce the chance of a viable third-party is to let go of the party primary. Both parties would be able to grow beyond their most extreme and hardline voters thanks to these election reforms. The reforms will bolster pragmatic politicians who are looking to please the majority of voters by solving problems rather than a small portion of the electorate that only wants them to fight the other side.

One of two things will happen, either more states will adopt Alaska's system, or the frustrated middle will become large enough to push both sides out. Traditional parties are being swept aside in favor of new, outsider ones in Europe.