The big flashpoints from the weekend's action were discussed by the host.
If you want a more accessible video player, please use the chrome browser.
Was Richarlison interfering with play when Spurs tied the game for the first time?
Is it possible?
The VAR will be asked to determine if he is impacting on the goalkeeper. They think that the ball came a long way, he's a long way away from the goalkeeper, and there was a nick off Kalidou Koulibaly. The logic is that the goal stood due to all of that. I can see why people would be angry at that decision.
He's interfering for me. I believe he is leaning to the left to see around. I like the distance from goal. The premier league is where players strike the ball at a fast pace. I think Richarlison is active. I know he's not, but he's on the field. The rule drives me crazy. He is in and around the area around the goal.
Is it a foul on Kai Havertz 44 seconds before Spurs tied the game?
It was a foul but the VAR can't go back that far.
De Reverend says that is definitely the case. The referee pointed at the ball and said he took it. He took the man instead of playing for the ball. The ref said no foul. The game goes on for 44 seconds. The consequence is more important than the incident.
Should the VAR have given a red card to the man who pulled the hair of another person?
It should have been stopped by the VAR because it was a red card and a free- kick.
I think the VAR should be involved, according to demot. I don't think the ref has seen it, but I think he does it instinctively. He looks at the flight of the ball. I think it has already happened, even though he looks down. The VAR looks great. I thought he was going to get a red card because he pulled him down. Anthony Taylor was going to be sent to the screen. If Anthony had been sent to the screen, he would have given a red card and a free kick to the Blues.
The two men had red cards after the handshake.
If you want a more accessible video player, please use the chrome browser.
It was inevitable that red cards would be issued.
It was inevitable that two red cards would come out for the managers because they were both on yellow cards at the time.
Tuchel ran out of his technical area.
Shouldn't have been a first booking.
He did not get a second yellow card. The officials thought it was a celebration. I don't think it's a good idea to do that. In the end, he was punished.
If you want a more accessible video player, please use the chrome browser.
Was it right for Said Benrahma's goal to be ruled out?
I watched this and didn't think it was a foul, but I saw it again and I can see why they gave it. The man leads with his arms. He runs into him because he has no chance of escaping the way.
The issue is that the block prevents him from closing down Declan Rice. I think it's the correct decision.
Could it have been a red card for Scott McKenna if he had committed a crime?
It's not the denial of a goal that makes the VAR work.
The ref doesn't see it, but he clearly handballs it, and that's what VAR is all about. The goalie is trying to get the ball. The VAR directed the referee to the ball, but it also said that the goalkeeper was diving behind. It's not the denial of a goal. It would have been a red card if the goalie hadn't been there.
If you want a more accessible video player, please use the chrome browser.
Should the penalty against Jamie Vardy be thrown out?
The decision not to give a penalty was the correct one.
This is a good example of VAR again. It's going into him when the man pulls up. I understand why the official gives a penalty, but the VAR recommends that he go across, even though the official gave the penalty. I don't believe there should be a yellow card for diving.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
