Physics15 August 2022

The issue of climate change is real. The rise in global average temperatures is the result of human-caused greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane.

Efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be too little and late. A group of people at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology came up with the idea of bubbles in space.

There are bubbles in space.

Two areas of concern are the basis of the thinking. The damage we have already done from over a century of advanced industrialization has already set the course of the Earth's climate trajectory in a bad direction.

Even if we were to stop all greenhouse gas emissions tomorrow, we would still have to live with the effects of climate change for decades and even centuries to come, including rising sea levels, more extreme weather events, and disruptions to food-production.

One way to limit the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth's surface is to release aerosols into the atmosphere.

Our climate system is so complex and dynamic that introducing artificial factors into the atmosphere can't be reversed, according to the team at MIT.

They are thinking space because of that. The idea is to make a raft of thin bubbles.

The sun's rays will be reflected or absorbed by those membranes. If we reduced the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth by 1.5 percent, we could completely eliminate the effects of our greenhouse gas output.

I'm not sure if this idea is a good one. The team doesn't know what the bubbles will be made out of or how they will be sent to the target location near the first point of the Earth-Sun system.

They will need to balance the forces of the Earth, the Sun, and other planets in order to keep the raft stable. The constant rain of the solar wind and micrometeoroids will be a challenge for them.

It would take a raft thousands of miles wide to block a small portion of the Sun's output. There is an engineering challenge to make it work.

And while the MIT researchers claim that this space-based approach is fully reversible, that's only in a certain sense. Yes, if we decide that the raft is a bad idea or not doing what we had hoped it would do, we could just let it float free or disassemble it.
But the Earth's climate is a complex system with many intricate feedback loops embedded in it that we do not fully understand.
What would be the total effects of blocking the Sun's light by one and a half percent over years, decades, and centuries? What effect would it have on the biosphere or the level of cloud cover or ocean evaporation or thousands of other considerations? Do we really believe that we have the technical and intellectual capacity to get this right?
Lastly, developing a solution that reduces the amount of sunlight hitting the Earth does nothing to address the underlying issue, which is that we are causing serious harm to the Earth's climate and biosphere.
If we have cover – pun intended – to do what we want, then why should we stop polluting or emitting greenhouse gases if we can just add more bubbles to the raft?
We need to address these fundamental problems, not just paper them over.
The team admits that there's a lot more work to be done, but I wouldn't be surprised if after years of work the realities of the complexity of this proposed solution… pop their bubble.
This article was originally published by Universe Today. Read the original article.