Kristen Radtke / The Verge; Getty Images

The 165-page document just made public by the Delaware Court of Chancery is an argument made by Musk's lawyers that his latest change of heart is actually all the fault of the social networking site.

The basics of the story are familiar to you. Musk bought a lot of the micro-blogging site's stock. Musk will take a seat on the company's board, but will not attempt to buy the company. After changing his mind, he lined up the necessary financing using some of his shares in Musk's company. After changing his mind, he tried to leave the deal and was sued by the company to force him to purchase it.

The Musk side is arguing that they strategically stonewalled, misrepresented, and bamboozled his efforts to find out how many people he had.

If you want to read a full argument, the Musk team's answers to the lawsuit are included.

Related

The Twitter v. Elon trial pregame heats up

Getting the document in one piece is easier than you might think. He claims that this fraud is contributing to a Material Adverse Effect that should allow him to walk away from the deal they signed.

Before they meet in court on October 17th, both sides need to be heard.