The rule that would have forced doctors to assist in transitioning patients out of their biological sex was issued by the Obama administration.
A provider that previously declined to provide a medically necessary hysterectomy for a trans man would have to revise its policy to provide the procedure for other individuals.
The rule left no room for religious physicians or institutions to breathe, instead threatening them with huge fines if they did not comply with the new line.
The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty obtained a preliminary injunction in federal court that stopped the rule from taking effect because it was likely to violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The decision was made permanent in 2021.
The Becket attorney who has been working on the case since the Obama-era rule was first issued will return to the courtroom on August 4.
The lawsuit was only about the 2016 rule, they said. They say, "Well, all you were challenging was the 2016 rule, and you won that, but now we're using a different rule or a different rationale for imposing the same requirement on you, and so you have to file a new lawsuit"
TheAffordable Care Act gives the administration all the authority it needs to punish groups that don't perform gender transitions and abortions. Becket alleges that the rule would force religious institutions to perform abortions.
The fight on appeal is about the scope of relief. He said that an effort was made to work around a losing legal argument by burdening religious objectors.
They want religious organizations to have to violate religious liberty every time the government violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and they want a ruling that will allow them to do so whenever they please.
That strategy is observable in the proposal of yet another, even broader rule, which is modeled after the 2016 one, which has made his political brand on waged one ruthless culture war after another.
The attorney general of California wanted to punish independent journalists who exposed the sale of fetal remains. The editorial board of the LA Times described his decision to charge those involved with felonies as disturbing.
He voted against legislation that would have allowed providers not to perform abortions without fear of government reprisal.
The rule is an attempt to make sure that whoever you are, whatever you look like, wherever you live, you have access to the care that you need so that your decisions are based on what's best for you.
That would mean that the attempt to bully religious providers into submission would be dead on arrival.
According to Goodrich, another victory for Becket would prohibit HHS from interpreting theAffordable Care Act to require religious doctors and hospitals to perform gender transitions or abortions, and that relief applies to its most recently proposed regulation.
The ramifications would be even more amazing if they lost.
If we lose, all the tens of thousands of religious doctors and hospitals in the country will be subject to huge financial penalties.
He said thatHHS could start punishing them tomorrow.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
