Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas suggested the court should reconsider rights like birth control and same sex marriage in future decisions after the court overturned abortion rights.

US-HOMOSEXUALITY-RIGHTS-JUSTICE-DISCRIMINATION-EMPLOYMENT

A group of demonstrators are outside of the U.S. Supreme Court.

AFP via Getty Images

The Supreme Court ruled that abortion is not a protected right under the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that states can't deprive people of "life, liberty or property, without due process of law".

Justice Samuel Alito said in the court's opinion that its ruling Friday should only apply to abortion and not other rulings the court has made.

The court's abortion cases are unique and justices only considered this one set of circumstances, rather than rights granted through "substantive due process" as a whole.

The court has a duty to consider Obergefell and other precedents in future cases.

The court should issue a ruling saying the court cannot grant civil rights using the due process clause because it is a legal fiction, according to Thomas.

The liberals wrote that it was impossible to understand how the opinion did not threaten any other rights.

PLAY Forbes Business Full Screen About Connatix In The Midst Of Special Season, Aaron Judge Heads Into A Most Interesting Arbitration Hearing Read More Chicago Bulls Stand Pat And Select Energetic Dalen Terry 18th In 2022 NBA Draft Read More Netflix Stock Could Rally With Ad-Supported Content Read More Read More Canada Goose Rival Bosideng Reports Profit Gain, Sees Apparel Recovery Read More Congrats, Clif Bar! Its Sale To Mondelez Boosts Our View That This Is ‘The ESOP Decade’ Read More 1/1 Skip Ad Continue watching after the ad Loading PodsVisit Advertiser websiteGO TO PAGE In The Midst Of Special Season, Aaron Judge Heads Into A Most Interesting Arbitration Hearing

In the future, we should follow the text of the Constitution, which sets forth certain substantive rights that cannot be taken away, and adds a right to due process when life, liberty, or property is to be taken away. It should be eliminated from our jurisprudence at the earliest chance.

Chief Critic

The liberal justices wrote in their dissent that they couldn't understand how anyone could be confident that today's opinion would be the last of its kind.

Key Background

After weeks of anticipation, the Supreme Court issued a ruling Friday that overturns the 1973 precedent. President Joe Biden said "Mark my words: They are going to go after the Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage." Several legal experts have warned that same-sex marriage rights are likely to be targeted after the Supreme Court overturned the landmark abortion law of 1973. Legal experts think Loving v. Virginia, which legalized interracial marriage, could also be at risk. Thomas and Alito wrote in October 2020 that the same-sex marriage ruling was threatening religious liberty and should be reconsidered.

The Supreme Court overturned a landmark abortion decision.

Legal experts fear that the rights of other people will be put at risk.

There is a possibility that birth control access could be in danger.