Giving metal to microbes could reduce greenhouse gas
Marsh wetland at Argonne National Laboratory. Credit: Jeffrey Catalano

Microbial need some metals in their diet to remain healthy. The metals help with digestion. Nitrogen, the gas that makes up 98% of Earth's atmosphere, is released by the microbes after a good meal.

These microbes can't complete the process of digestion if copper isn't available. nitrous oxide will be released instead of nitrogen.

The availability of copper was important for denitrification. The lab of Daniel Giammar, the Walter E. Browne Professor of Environmental Engineering at the McKelvey School of Engineering, and Jeffrey Catalano, professor of earth and planetary sciences in Arts & Sciences, both at Washington University in St.

Their work was published in a journal.

Material in a beaker isn't the same as material in the environment. We took real materials from real environmental systems and brought them to the lab and looked at them in controlled ways.

When it comes to the release of nitrous oxide, copper has an outsized role to play. A student in Giammar's lab said that the systems may not have enough metals to do the job.

It's important because nitrous oxide is the third most potent greenhouse gas and half of it comes from aquatic organisms.

The senior scientist in Catalano's lab, Elaine Flynn, went to the source to find out how copper affected the gas's release. Sharma and Flynn collected microbes from wetlands and riverbeds while working with the DOE labs. The amount of copper in the systems wasn't enough to complete denitrification.

Giving metal to microbes could reduce greenhouse gas
Riparian wetland at Tims Branch. Credit: Kenneth Kemner/Argonne National Laboratory

If we manually added copper, would the release of nitrous oxide be affected? The thing did. All of the nitrous oxide was converted into something else.

She said that putting metals into the natural systems could mitigate the release of N 2 O. It could have an effect on researchers who are studying climate.

The models that predict the release of gases don't account for the factors. The effect of metals on this aspect of greenhouse gases is not included in the factors that affect greenhouse gas release.

It's extreme complexity.

Climate models need to include all of the real-world complexity present in specific environments for people to truly understand and make useful predictions about climate.

The behaviors of four different metals were analyzed in a study published in May in the journal.

The professor wanted to know if the metals' availability changed when there was little oxygen in the water.

The team believed that the four metals might act the same way. They were surprised that the metals acted differently in the same situation.

The amount of certain metals changes with the seasons. The complexity of natural systems is highlighted by it.

A lot of specialists and partners are needed to capture that complexity.

We're always wondering why this matters. This is going to affect the climate. What can we do to make things better? Giammar spoke. We collaborated with Jeffrey Catalano, who gave the work a stronggeochemistry perspective.

This research contributes to the knowledge base of the DOE, as well as receiving funding and access to Watersheds from the DOE laboratories.

One more piece of the puzzle is the study of the biogeochemical functions. Other researchers in the same field do the same thing.

Knowledge can change the way people think about climate.

Giammar said that the copper limitation was bigger than they thought. Getting into the environmental complexity is important.

More information: Neha Sharma et al, Copper availability governs nitrous oxide accumulation in wetland soils and stream sediments, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2022.04.019

The Dynamic Responses of Trace Metal Bioaccessibility to Fluctuating Redox Conditions in Wetlands is a paper written by the authors. The title is "acsearthspacechem.2c00031."

Journal information: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta