For those who are "sick of Windows but can't afford a Mac," the article begins by addressing people who complain there's too many Linux distros to choose from. "We thought we'd simplify things for you by listing how and in which ways the different options suck." - The year of Linux on the desktop came and went, and nobody noticed — maybe because it doesn't say "Linux" on it. ChromeOS only runs on ChromeBooks and ChromeBoxes, but they outsold Macs for a while before the pandemic. "Flex" is the version for ordinary PCs... ChromeOS Flex works great, because it only does one thing: browse the web. You can't install apps, not even Android ones: only official kit does that. You can run Debian containers: if you know what that means, go run Debian. If you don't know what that means, trust us, you don't want to.
The word "Ubuntu" means I can't set up the system.
Mint is a remake of an older version of the Linux operating system. It was an also-ran for a long time, but when it went all Mac-like it was able to grab it and the number one spot in the charts. It replaces some of the questionable bits of recent Ubuntu with some of its own, such as a confusing choice of not one, not two, but three windows-like desktops, and overly cautious approaches to updates and upgrades.
- Debian is the daddy of free distros, and the one that invented the idea of a packaging tool that automatically installs dependencies. It's easier than it used to be, but mired in politics. It's sort of like Ubuntu, but more out of date, harder to install, and with fewer drivers. If that sounds just your sort of thing, go for it.
There's 10 snarky entries in all, zinging Fedora, openSUSE, Arch Linux, and Pop!_OS — as well as the various spinoffs of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. (The article calls Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux "RHEL with the serial numbers filed off.") And there's also one final catch-call entry for "Tiny obscure distros. All of them."A big thank you to Slashdot reader AleRunner who shared the link.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
