A federal appeals court has made it easier to disqualify political candidates for being insurrectionists. A case was filed Tuesday against him based on his alleged support for the January 6 attack on the Capitol building.

Election 2022 North Carolina Cawthorn

Representative Madison Cawthorn spoke at a rally in North Carolina.

ASSOCIATED PRESS

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Cawthorn in a lawsuit that he filed earlier this year to stop voters from asking the North Carolina State Board of Elections to prevent him from running for office.

The voters argued that Cawthorn should not be on the ballot because of actions that they said showed support for the January 6 attack, which they said goes against a provision in the 14th Amendment that bars members of Congress from holding office if they engage in.

A district court judge who was appointed by former President Donald Trump found that a federal law passed in 1872 ensured that ex-Confederates could still hold office after the Civil War.

The Appeals Court ruled on Tuesday that the 1872Amnesty Act only applied to ex-Confederates and that future candidates like Cawthorn should not be disqualified.

Heytens doesn't take a stance on whether Cawthorn should be disqualified because voters can challenge politicians' candidacy.

Requests for comment from Cawthorn's office have not been responded to.

PLAY Forbes Business Full Screen About Connatix Coffee To Eat: Legendary Japanese Barista Launches Edible Espresso Read More Bourgogne Grapples With Fighting Frost Without Producing Emissions Read More The Power Of Hollywood’s Leading Woman And How It Is Shaping Culture Read More Read More Biden Says The Quiet Part About The Energy Transition Out Loud Read More Biden’s Indo-Pacific Pact: What Does ‘Friend-Shoring’ Mean For Asia Read More 1/1 Skip Ad Continue watching after the ad Loading PodsVisit Advertiser websiteGO TO PAGE Coffee To Eat: Legendary Japanese Barista Launches Edible Espresso

The ruling shows that the 1872Amnesty Act does not protect insurrectionists from consequences of their actions under the Fourteenth Amendment.

What To Watch For

Cawthorn lost his primary election last week, so Tuesday's ruling won't have a practical impact on him. The challenge against his candidacy was part of a broader effort by Free Speech for People to kick out those who supported the January 6 riot. The group has already filed complaints against other Republican candidates. The group is appealing a ruling that allowed a Georgia lawmaker to stay on the ballot. The decision was based on state law and doesn't directly concern the 1872Amnesty Act, as a state judge and Secretary of State found there isn't enough evidence to suggest that.

Key Background

Cawthorn filed a lawsuit trying to stop the efforts of Free Speech for People and North Carolina voters, who first challenged his candidacy in January. Cawthorn was among the speakers at a rally that immediately preceded the January 6, 2021, storming of the Capitol building and told the crowd they have some fight, though he has denied any involvement with the subsequent attack on the Capitol. Since January 6, he has made comments in support of the rioters, calling them political hostages and political prisoners.

The judge rules that Rep. Madison Cawthorn can run for reelection despite January 6 role.

There is a reason why Rep. Madison Cawthorn might be kept off the ballot.

Georgia voters appeal decision allowing Marjorie Taylor Greene to stay on the ballot.

Madison Cawthorn lost the GOP primary.

A Time Line of Madison Cawthorn's Missteps.