That was amazing. There is nothing else to say about what I have just seen.
After a day of intense drama, and another unbelievable comeback, Manchester City have just won their fourth Premier League title in five seasons, which is an amazing achievement, but why does it feel like they still don't get the credit they deserve?
When we look back at this era in 10 or 20 years time, we will see that the two greatest sides in English football have been the Manchester City side and theLiverpool side.
Right now, it feels like the fans of the other team love them.
The accepted narrative in many parts of the media is that the side play better and more exciting football, but that they have also achieved their success without spending a lot of money.
City is boring to watch and I have bought their titles. Apparently, anyone could do what my old team did and it was bad for football.
I find it very annoying that some people accept this as the truth. How could anyone say what City has done is dull?
What is the basis for that view? Is greatness now boring, or is it just when City are involved?
It's ridiculous to suggest that the team has built on a shoestring budget.
When a team such asLeicester win the title, you put your hands up and say it is an incredible feat, but for a few reasons.
That spending power has made a difference.
This is the second time in as many years that a Klopp side have ended with 90-plus points but missed out on the title, and they have been pushed to even greater heights by the rivalry with City.
While they were chasing a first English quadruple this season, I kept hearing how good they were, so how good must the team be that, over the course of 38 games, has finished above them four times in the past five years?
It makes no sense to me that City never gets the same recognition as Liverpool even if they win or how they do it. Hopefully Sunday will finally silence that argument and show everyone that they are not boring.
The entire campaign has been brilliant for City. I don't think there was one specific moment when the title defence was turning point.
The same margin as when they beat the Reds to the title in 2019: one point.
City probably could have won it by more, but they only drew 2-2 with the Reds when they should have won on both occasions. The first meeting between the top two sums up the different ways they are perceived.
In October, the stand-in right-back could have been sent off twice. City deserved to win.
Everyone wanted to talk about how good they were. It was because of that goal. It was special, but the team display by the Reds was not great.
It is possible to single out individuals for praise. I like the way he plays and his dribbling skills. Luis Diaz has been electric since he was signed by the Reds.
City have not been dull in their 37 other league games.
City play amazing football and that makes their opposition boring to watch most of the time.
We are talking about a team that has a lot of possession, and their opponents often can't get near them. Some don't even try.
If the opposing team want to set up camp on the edge of their own 18-yard box and keep a low block for 90 minutes, how are City the ones who get the tag of being dull?
I would get it if they were a defensive-minded team that achieved results by parking the bus. They have scored 99 goals this season in the league, so that is not the case.
It doesn't matter if you are a fan or not. Football is a joy to watch if you love it. There is no hope for you if you did not enjoy Sunday.
City won the title because of the standards they set in the first month of the season.
They lost at Spurs on the opening weekend, but they didn't have a full squad available, and a lot of the players who did feature weren't fully fit.
They lost to Crystal Palace at the end of October and then to Harry Kane and Spurs in February.
City won 14 league games and drew the other one after the two defeats. When they get their players fully fit a few weeks into the season, we have seen them go on those kind of runs before.
They are unstoppable when they get into a high gear.
I was at City when we won the league in 2012 and 2014, and we got over the line both times, which takes some doing in itself.
I played in two great City teams, and they were both great, but the ones I played in now feel like they are on a completely different level.
Some of the criticism directed at City is understandable.
They would have won everything possible in the past six years if they had lifted it.
I wanted them to do it so much this time because it would put away the argument that you cannot be a great team without winning it.
The premier league is the most important prize for me. When I saw other teams win it, it seemed easy but when I was there, I realized how hard it is to finish top of the pile.
You have to be consistent to become a champion, and the next challenge is to keep your focus when trying to defend your title. It was something we were not able to do in my day.
I have admiration for the City team after watching them fight back against Villa and hold off the Reds.
They have shown great character over the past nine months, but never more than in the second half on Sunday, when time was running out and Villa was hanging on.
Richards was talking to Chris Bevan.
All Rights Reserved © 2024
