The article was originally published at The Conversation.

One of the most frequent questions I am asked as a physicist is when are you going to find something. Resisting the temptation to reply "I don't know", which won the award for the best reply.

We talk a lot about progress in discovering new particles. Studying a heavy particle can help us see the underlying physical processes. It's easy to explain the value of the discovery to the public.

A series of precise measurements of already known particles and processes have threatened to shake up physics. It is time to start discussing the implications of the Large Hadron Collider running at higher energy and intensity than ever before.

RECOMMENDED VIDEOS FOR YOU...

New particles are one of two ways particle physics has proceeded. The other is to make very precise measurements that test the predictions of theories and look for deviations from what is expected.

The early evidence for Einstein's theory of general relativity came from discovering small deviations in the apparent positions of stars and from the motion of Mercury.

Three key findings

Particles obey a successful theory called quantum mechanics. quantum fluctuations show that particles too big to be made directly in a lab collision can still influence what other particles do. It's difficult to explain the effects to the public.

Recent results hint at unexplained new physics beyond the standard model. Detailed studies from the experiment found that a particle known as a beauty quark falls apart into an electron. The standard model suggests that new particles or forces of nature may influence the process.

LHCb experiment.

LHCb experiment. (Image credit: Cern)

Measurement of similar processes involving top quarks from the ATLAS experiment show that decay occurs at the same rate for both electrons and muons.

The Muon g-2 experiment at the US's Fermilab has recently made very precise studies of how muons jiggle as their spin interacts with surrounding magnetic material. It found a small but significant deviation from some theoretical predictions, again suggesting that unknown forces or particles may be at work.

A measurement of the mass of a fundamental particle called the W boson, which carries the weak nuclear force that governs radioactive decay, has been surprising. After many years of data taking and analysis, the experiment at Fermilab suggests that it is heavier than theory predicts, deviating by an amount that would not happen by chance in more than a million million experiments. It is possible that undiscovered particles are adding to its mass.

This also disagrees with some lower-precision measurements from the LHC.

The verdict

The evidence seems to be growing that some new physics is needed to explain the effects.

There will be many new mechanisms proposed to explain these observations. Many will look at various forms of supersymmetry. The idea is that there are more fundamental particles in the standard model than we thought. The field that gives fundamental particles their mass may be involved.

Technicolor, which is less recently fashionable, suggests that there are additional forces of nature, such as gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak and strong nuclear forces. Experiments will reveal the truth, which is good news for experimentalists.

The teams behind the new findings have been working on the problems for a long time. It is not disrespectful to note that these are very difficult to make. The standard model requires calculations where approximations have to be made. Depending on the level of approximation made, different theorists can predict slightly different rates of decay. Some of the new findings may fit with the standard model when we do more accurate calculations.

It could be that the researchers are using subtly different interpretations. It is important to check that the same level of approximation has been used in both cases.

These are two examples of sources ofsystematic uncertainty, and while all concerned do their best to quantify them, there can be unforeseen complications that under- or over-estimate them.

The current results are still interesting and important. There are multiple pathways to a deeper understanding of the new physics that need to be explored.

There are still possibilities of new particles being made through rarer processes or hidden under the previous background that we have yet to uncover.

The article is licensed under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Follow all of the Expert Voices issues and debates and become a part of the discussion on social media. The author's views are not necessarily those of the publisher.