Moon Doesn’t Look Its Age: Scientists Reveal How Old Earth Satellite Really Is


The findings were based on analysis of minerals from the moon called zircons that were brought back to Earth by the Apollo 14 mission in 1971, a press release on UCLA’s website says. The report was published on January 11 in the journal Science Advances.

“Zircons are nature’s best clocks,” said Kevin McKeegan, a UCLA professor of geochemistry and cosmochemistry, and a co-author of the study. “They are the best mineral in preserving geological history and revealing where they originated.”

The group used mass spectrometry techniques to study samples of eight zircon grains and compared spectrometric data to the figures attributed to the time of the solar system’s formation.

The results showed that the Moon formed “only” about 60 million years after the birth of the solar system, while previously it was believed that it happened 100 or 200 million years after the solar system’s formation.

Previous studies concluded the moon’s age based on moon rocks that had been contaminated by multiple meteorite collisions. McKeegan said those rocks indicated the date of some other events, but not the age of the moon.

In 2016 a UCLA-led team of geochemists proved that the moon was formed by a violent, head-on collision between the early Earth and a “planetary embryo” called Theia. The Earth’s collision with Theia created a liquefied moon, which then solidified. Scientists believe most of the moon’s surface was covered with magma right after its formation.

Never miss a story again – sign up to our Telegram channel and we’ll keep you up to speed!